Look closely at the deer in this photograph, taken in 1852 by John Dillwyn Llewelyn in the woods around his estate. Notice anything unusual?
The deer is actually stuffed, says Matthew Brower, a professor of museum studies and the author of a new book about early American wildlife photography.
While the modern viewer might consider this “faked” wildlife photography, taking pictures of a taxidermied animal in a natural setting made sense at the time as a means of representing “wild” animals, says Brower. “There was no sense of animals as part of a healthy habitat. The deer was simply an accent for the landscape.” Llewelyn wouldn’t have been able to capture the image of a live deer, even if he had wanted to. Cameras didn’t have shutters and exposures lasted at least a minute. A wild animal wouldn’t have stood still for even a fraction of the time required.
Brower’s book, Developing Animals, looks at how photographing animals has changed through time, and how it has altered the way humans relate to animals. “We’ve come to see wildlife photography as ‘true’ representations of live animals in nature, and we think it’s always been this way,” says Brower. “But it hasn’t. Our thinking has evolved.”
Recent Posts
Writing in a Tumultuous Time
Téa Mutonji finds creative possibility in the freedom of her youth
Canada’s Next Innovation Leaders
The Schulich Leader Scholarships support talented science undergrads who are interested in entrepreneurship
A Lifeline for an Endangered Language
U of T linguists have partnered with an Indigenous community member to bring the Munsee dialect back from the brink of extinction