Reflecting on the increasing turmoil and polarization around the world in recent years, we would do well to ask: what is the role of universities in helping to secure peaceful and sustainable democracies?
First, we must ensure that our campuses remain places that accommodate, foster and enable important discussions about difficult and contentious issues. Dialogue and debate across difference are the lifeblood of the academy – and indeed, the lifeblood of democracy.
University communities must engage challenging topics both to advance social progress and to teach the fundamentals of citizenship. If we succeed, we will enhance our ability to educate democratic citizens who are prepared to engage fully in civic life.
The second responsibility for universities flows directly from the first. We must foster excellence in all its forms. A broad and diverse range of people, experiences and perspectives must thrive on our campuses. Wrestling with new or uncomfortable ideas in the shared pursuit of knowledge sparks understanding and innovation. Healthy debate and purposeful pluralism require a varied intellectual environment. Echo-chamber dialogue, as we so often see online, is not dialogue at all, but empty monologue.
This points to the third key responsibility for universities: ensuring equality of access to education for students, and equality of opportunity for diverse faculty and staff. Universities have a special role to play in creating opportunity for those who come from disadvantaged and underrepresented backgrounds, providing a springboard to upward social mobility and seeding our campuses with a wider variety of perspectives.
To do this, universities must remain accessible to the broadest range of prospective students, faculty and staff, and we must seek them out rather than waiting for them to come to us. This means recruiting purposefully, as well as committing to student aid.
Canada’s university system is relatively successful in welcoming students from diverse backgrounds and offering an exceptional education. For example, the University of Toronto hosts upwards of 95,000 students, more than two-thirds of whom come from racialized communities, and one-half of our domestic undergraduate students come from households of modest means. At the same time, U of T is consistently ranked among the world’s top universities. So it is possible to do “excellence at scale,” and to achieve what we call “inclusive excellence.”
The COVID-19 pandemic and other major developments have exposed new challenges for pluralism, diversity and opportunity – and they have exacerbated traditional ones. Universities must acknowledge these challenges and tackle them head-on. After all, the support we enjoy from the public may well depend on our success in ensuring access for academically deserving students, regardless of their means or socio-cultural background, as well as our ability to model meaningful debate among people of diverse views.
U of T’s 196th Birthday Quiz
Test your knowledge of all things U of T in honour of the university’s 196th anniversary on March 15!
Spreading the Gospel
A Juno Award-winning teacher wants all his students to feel there is a place for them in music
Cities Are Driving Evolution
Globally crowdsourced study shows that white clovers are biologically adapting to city life, demonstrating the profound impact of urbanization
4 Responses to “ Universities Can Bolster Democracy ”
When can you get started?
This article has been a long time in coming. As of late, universities have been known to be echo chambers. We must guard against discrimination, but healthy debate of sensitive topics is required for democracy to flourish. Note that topics are not persons!
Excellent points about dialogue, debate, diverse opinions and tackling contentious issues.
“Structured academic controversy” is a teaching strategy designed by David and Roger Johnson (researchers and writers in cooperative learning) in which students take turns debating both sides of an issue. We did this with Grade 4 students in a project with the Ministry of Education in Tasmania about 25 years ago. The students, who had been taught how to suspend judgment, disagree agreeably, accept and extend the ideas of others, and consider all factors, debated whether students with AIDS should come to their school. In the end, most students were in favour. Debating, like playing the violin or volleyball, requires a certain set of skills. It helps if those participating debate both sides of an issue – not just to understand each perspective, but to “feel” them as well.